Cyber-biosecurity; A Paradigm Shift in the Field of Life Sciences and Agriculture Sector
Published: 2023-06-05
Page: 58-75
Issue: 2023 - Volume 6 [Issue 1]
Burak Cinar *
Think Secure Inc., Turkiye.
Reji Kurien Thomas
VIRENXIA, UAE.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The fields of information technology (IT) and cybersecurity are becoming more integrated with the life sciences. This convergence is a fundamental driver in the boom of biotechnology research and its industrial applications in health care, agriculture, manufacturing, automation, artificial intelligence, and synthetic biology. Other drivers include artificial intelligence and genetic engineering. Many market sectors are now susceptible to dangers posed by the digital interface as a result of the rising digitization of information and the handling mechanisms for biological materials. Cyber-biosecurity, a new topic developing at the intersection of the biological sciences and the information technology fields, will be developed to handle this expanding scenario. Life sciences frequently merge with information technology and cyber-security in the new digital era. With the advancements in biomedical research and the scientific advancement of contemporary biotechnology, there is an exponential growth in the number of related information sets, necessitating cloud storage, cutting-edge management and analysis techniques, as well as adequate content protection. The worldwide, national, and local collaboration among transdisciplinary sectors and various public-private system players are only a few examples of the common, many, and diversified acts that make up the bioeconomy landscape. In addition, cyber-biosecurity concerns bring attention to an environment that is highly vulnerable and is developing quickly. Additionally, the global spread of the new virus SARS-CoV-2 has created a pandemic context that has highlighted some issues (such as the significance of strategic autonomy in supply chains for food, medical, and pharmaceutical products, the development of critical functional infrastructures, the appropriate prevention and protection measures, including the management of rapid and effective responses to pandemics or other potential malicious actions with regard to the Vulnerabilities like data confidentiality (i.e., clinical and genetic information), cloud storage, and intellectual property may present opportunities that could be taken advantage of as science advances, depending on the application of new technologies in fields like artificial intelligence, process automation, bioinformatics, and synthetic biology. The strongest feasible cyber defense must anticipate and include potential biological threats into its procedures. This review summarizes all the aspects of new discipline of cyber-biosecurity.
Keywords: Cyber-biosecurity, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, information technology
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Kruse CS, Frederick B, Jacobson T, Monticone DK. Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(1):1-10.
Ross RS, Feldman L, Witte GA. Rethinking security through systems security engineering; 2016.
Fernández ÒS, et al. Shared medical record, personal health folder and health and social integrated care in Catalonia: ICT services for integrated care. In New Perspect Med Rec. 2017:49-64.
Kam R. The human risk factor of a healthcare data breach-Community Blog. Heal It Exch. 2015.
Arndt R. In healthcare, breach dangers come from inside the house. Mod Healthc. 2018.
Dimitrov DV. Medical internet of things and big data in healthcare. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22(3):156-63.
Filkins BL, Kim JY, Roberts B, Armstrong W, Miller MA, Hultner ML, et al. Privacy and security in the era of digital health: what should translational researchers know and do about it? Am J Transl Res. 2016;8(3):1560-80.
Abelson R, Goldstein M. Anthem hacking points to security vulnerability of health care industry. The New York Times; 2015.
Kangas E. Why are hackers targeting your medical records?; 2017.
Walker T. Interoperability a must for hospitals, but it comes with risks. Manag Healthc Exec. 2017.
Shenoy A, Appel JM. Safeguarding confidentiality in electronic health records. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017;26(2):337-41.
Szegedy C et al. Intriguing Properties of Neural Networks. arXiv; 2013. Available from: cs.CV.
Nguyen A, Yosinski J, Clune J. Deep neural networks are easily fooled: high confidence predictions for unrecognizable images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2015;427-36.
Jurcys P, Donewald C, Fenwick M, Lampinen M, Smaliukas A. Ownership of user-held data: Why property law is the right approach. Law Technol. Digest. SSRN Journal; 2020.
Sweeney L, Abu A, Winn J. Identifying participants in the personal genome project by name. SSRN Journal. Available at SSRN; 2013.
Nakamura Y et al. KART: Parameterization of privacy leakage scenarios from pretrained language models. arXiv [cs.CL] (2020).
Barth-Jones DC. The’re-identification’ of Governor William Weld’s medical information: A critical re-examination of health data identification risks and privacy protections, then and now. SSRN Electron J. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2076397.
Narayanan A, Shmatikov V. Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets, in 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008); 2008;111-25.
Robert Philipp economics and statistics, University of Vienna, Austria, Andreas Mladenow economics and statistics. Austria: Universität Wien. Austria: Christine Strauss Economics and Statistics, University of Vienna & Austria: Alexander Völz Economics and Statistics, University of Vienna. Machine Learning as a Service. ACM Other conferences. Available:https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3428757.3429152.
Kesarwani M, IBM Research, India BM, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Arya V, IBM Research et al., India. Model Extraction Warning in MLaaS Paradigm. ACM Other conferences. Avaialble:https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3274694.3274740
Meiseles A, Rosenberg I, Motro Y, Rokach L, Moran-Gilad J. Adversarial vulnerability of deep learning models in analyzing next generation sequencing data. IEEE Publications; 2021. DOI: 10.1109/BIBM49941.2020.9313421.
Aminifar A. Minimal adversarial perturbations in mobile health applications: the epileptic brain activity case study. In: ICASSP IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 2020;1205-9.
DOI:10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053706
Bhambri S, Muku S, Tulasi A, Buduru AB. A survey of black-box adversarial attacks on computer vision models. arXiv [cs.LG]; 2019.
Shokri R, Stronati M, Song C, Shmatikov V. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models, in 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). 2017; 3-18.
Long Y et al. Understanding Membership Inferences on Well-Generalized Learning Models. arXiv; 2018.
Available: cs.CR.
Nasr M, Shokri R, Houmansadr A. Comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning: passive and active white-box inference attacks against centralized and federated learning, in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP); 2019. DOI: 10.1109/sp.2019.00065.
Fredrikson M, Jha S, Ristenpart T. Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. In: Proceedings of the 22 nd ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. Association for Computing Machinery. 2015;1322-33. DOI: 10.1145/2810103.2813677.
Salem A, Bhattacharya A, Backes M, Fritz M, Zhang Y{Updates-Leak}$: Data set inference and reconstruction attacks in online learning, in 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20). 2020;1291–1308.
Tramèr F, Zhang F, Juels A, Reiter MK, Ristenpart T. Stealing machine learning models via prediction ${APIs}$. In: 25th USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 16). 2016;601-18.
Wang B, Gong NZ. Stealing hyperparameters in machine learning, in 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). 2018;36-52.
Sivathanu G, Wright CP, Zadok E. Ensuring data integrity in storage: techniques and applications. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on storage security and survivability. Association for Computing Machinery. 2005;26-36. DOI: 10.1145/1103780.1103784.
Jegorova M, Kaul C, Mayor C, O’Neil AQ, Weir A, Murray-Smith R et al. Survey: leakage and privacy at inference time. arXiv [cs.LG] (2021). IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022;PP. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3229593
Nakamoto B. A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Bus Rev. 2008;21260.
Mettler M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here, in 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom). 2016;1-3.
Jabbar R, Fetais N, Krichen M, Barkaoui K. Blockchain technology for healthcare: Enhancing shared electronic health record interoperability and integrity, in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies (ICIoT). 2020;310-7.
Guardtime health. Available:https://m.guardtime.com/files/Guardtime_whitepaper_A4_april_web.pdf
Liu X, Xie L, Wang Y, Zou J, Xiong J, Ying Z et al. Privacy and security issues in deep learning: A survey. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:4566-93. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045078.
Liu X, Cheng M, Zhang H, Hsieh C-J. Towards robust neural networks via random self-ensemble. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 2018;381-97.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_23.
Lecuyer M, Atlidakis V, Geambasu R, Hsu D, Jana S. Certified robustness to adversarial examples with differential privacy, in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). 2019;656-72.
Oliveira SRM, Zaiane OR. Protecting sensitive knowledge by data sanitization. In: Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2003;613-6. DOI: 10.1109/ICDM.2003.1250990.
Chan FM et al. Genotype imputation with homomorphic encryption, in 2021 6th International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing. Association for Computing Machinery. 2021;9-13.
Yao AC. Protocols for secure computations. In: 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1982). 1982;160-4. DOI: 10.1109/SFCS.1982.38.
Choi JI, Butler KRB. Secure multiparty computation and trusted hardware: examining adoption challenges and opportunities. Secur Commun Netw. 2019;2019:1-28. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1368905.
Shepherd C et al. Secure and trusted execution: past, present, and future – A critical review in the context of the internet of things and cyber-physical systems, in 2016 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA. 2016;168-77.
Anati I, Gueron S, S. Innovative technology for CPU based attestation and sealing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on hardware and architectural support for security and privacy. Johnson: V. Scarlata. Acad Med New York. 2013;13.
NVIDIA, NVIDIA. H100 tensor core GPU architecture overview; 2022. Available: https://resources.nvidia.com/en-us-tensor-core
Acar A, Aksu H, Uluagac AS, Conti M. A survey on homomorphic encryption schemes: theory and implementation. ACM Comput Surv. 2019;51(4):1-35. DOI: 10.1145/3214303.
Battista Biggioab FR. Wild patterns: ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning. Pattern Recognit. 2018;84.
Chen F, Wang C, Dai W, Jiang X, Mohammed N, Al Aziz MM et al. PRESAGE: PRivacy-preserving gEnetic testing via SoftwAre Guard Extension. BMC Med Genomics. 2017;10;Suppl 2:48. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-017-0281-2
Chen F, PRINCESS. Privacy-protecting rare disease international network collaboration via encryption through software guard extension S. Bioinformatics. 2017;33.
Cramer R, Damgard IB, Nielsen JB. Secure multiparty computation and secret sharing. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
Dwork C, et al. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. J Priv Confid. 2017;7.
Dwork C, Roth A. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. FNT in Theoretical Computer Science. 2013;9(3-4):211-407. DOI: 10.1561/0400000042.
Finlayson SG, Bowers JD, Ito J, Zittrain JL, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning. Science. 2019;363(6433):1287-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw4399
Richardson LC, Connell ND, Lewis SM, Pauwels E, Murch RS. Cyberbiosecurity: A call for cooperation in a new threat landscape. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00099
Gentry C. A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. Stanford University; 2009.
Gürsoy G, Emani P, Brannon CM, Jolanki OA, Harmanci A, Strattan JS et al. Data sanitization to reduce private information leakage from functional genomics. Cell. 2020;183(4):905-917.e16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.036
Gürsoy G. Functional genomics data: privacy risk assessment and technological mitigation. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23.
Gürsoy G, Chielle E, Brannon CM, Maniatakos M, Gerstein M. Privacy-preserving genotype imputation with fully homomorphic encryption. Cell Syst. 2022;13(2):173-182.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.10.003
Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013; 339(6117):321-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1229566
Harmanci A, Gerstein M. Quantification of private information leakage from phenotype-genotype data: linking attacks. Nat Methods. 2016;13(3):251-6. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3746
Hummel P, Braun M, Dabrock P. Own data? Ethical reflections on data ownership. Philos Technol. 2021;34(3): 545-72. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-020-00404-9.
Iwendi C, Moqurrab SA, Anjum A, Khan S, Mohan S, Srivastava G. N-Sanitization: A semantic privacy-preserving framework for unstructured medical datasets. Comput Commun. 2020;161:160-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.07.032
Joly Y, Dyke SOM, Knoppers BM, Pastinen T. Are data sharing and privacy protection mutually exclusive? Cell. 2016; 167(5):1150-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.004
Khan SI, Hoque ASM. Digital health data: A comprehensive review of privacy and security risks and some recommendations. Comput Sci J Moldova. 2016;24.
Kim M, Harmanci AO, Bossuat JP, Carpov S, Cheon JH, Chillotti I et al. Ultrafast homomorphic encryption models enable secure outsourcing of genotype imputation. Cell Syst. 2021;12(11):1108-1120.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.07.010
Greenbaum D. An analysis of federal circuit discrimination: the evolution of the written description requirement vis-a-vis DNA and biotechnological inventions concerns for synthetic biology. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2011;5(3): 153-65. DOI: 10.2174/187221511797636284
Greenbaum D. Avoiding overregulation in the medical internet of things. In: Big data, health law and bioethics. Cambridge University Press; 2018.
Greenbaum D. Biology’s brave new world Biohackers Christian Ditter Netflix, 2020. 6 episodes. Science. 2020;369(6508): 1170. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe1950.
Harmanci A, Gerstein M. Analysis of sensitive information leakage in functional genomics signal profiles through genomic deletions. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1): 2453. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04875-5
Hayden EC. Privacy protections: The genome hacker. Nature. 2013;497(7448): 172-4. DOI: 10.1038/497172a
Homer N, Szelinger S, Redman M, Duggan D, Tembe W, Muehling J et al. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. Plos Genet. 2008; 4(8):e1000167. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167
Greenbaum D. Making compassionate use more useful: using real-world data, real-world evidence and digital twins to supplement or supplant randomized controlled trials. Pac Symp Biocomput. Proceedings of the Pacific symposium. 2021;26:38-49. DOI: 10.1142/9789811232701_0004
Greenbaum D. Cyberbiosecurity: an emerging field that has ethical implications for clinical neuroscience. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021;30(4):662-8. DOI: 10.1017/S096318012100013X
Greenbaum D, Luscombe NM, Jansen R, Qian J, Gerstein M. Interrelating different types of genomic data, from proteome to secretome: ’Oming in on function’. Genome Res. 2001;11(9):1463-8. doi: 10.1101/gr.207401, PMID 11544189.
Liv N, Greenbaum D. Cyberneurosecurity. In: Dubljevi, Coin A, editors. Policy, identity and neurotechnology: the neuroethics of brain-computer-interfaces, V. 2023:233-51. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-26801-4_13
Oeschger FM, Jenal U. Addressing the misuse potential of life science research – perspectives from a bottom-up initiative in Switzerland Gain of Function Research of Concern. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:38. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00038
Puzis R, Farbiash D, Brodt O, Elovici Y, Greenbaum D. Increased cyber-biosecurity for DNA synthesis. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(12):1379-81. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-00761-y
Sherman M, Idan Z, Greenbaum D. Who watches the step-watchers: the ups and downs of turning anecdotal citizen science into actionable clinical data. Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(8):44-6. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619873
Yu H, Zhu X, Greenbaum D, Karro J, Gerstein M. TopNet: A tool for comparing biological sub-networks, correlating protein properties with topological statistics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(1):328-37. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh164
Almilaji O, Engen V, Snook J, Docherty S. The development of a clinical decision-support web-based tool for predicting the risk of gastrointestinal cancer in iron deficiency anaemia—The IDIOM app. Digital. 2022;2(1):104-19.
DOI: 10.3390/digital2010007.
Beckers R, Kwade Z, Zanca F. The EU medical device regulation: implications for artificial intelligence-based medical device software in medical physics. Phys Med. 2021;83:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.011
Ben-Menahem SM, Nistor-Gallo R, Macia G, von Krogh G, Goldhahn J. How the new European regulation on medical devices will affect innovation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(6):585-90. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0541-x
Bhatia RS, Shojania KG, Levinson W. Cost of contact: redesigning healthcare in the age of COVID. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021; 30(3):236-9. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011624
Blythe JM, Johnson SD. A systematic review of crime facilitated by the consumer Internet of Things. Sec J. 2021;34(1):97-125. DOI: 10.1057/s41284-019-00211-8
Elgabry, M. D. Nesbeth, and S. Johnson, The future of biotechnology crime: A parallel Delphi study with nontraditional experts. Futures. 2022;141.
Ghafur S, Grass E, Jennings NR, Darzi A. The challenges of cybersecurity in health care: the UK National Health Service as a case study. Lancet Digit Health. 2019; 1(1):e10-2. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30005-6
Han JED, Ibrahim H, Aiyegbusi OL, Liu X, Marston E, Denniston AK, et al. Opportunities and risks of UK medical device reform. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022;56(4):596-606. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-022-00394-0, PMID 35416614.
Elgabry M. Towards cyber-biosecurity by design: an experimental approach to Internet-of-Medical-Things design and development. Crime Sci. 2023;12(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/s40163-023-00181-8.
Australian Government. Australia’s cyber security strategy 2020. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2020.
Barrett D. U.S. Plans to use spy law to battle corporate espionage. Wall St J.; 2015.
Bajema N, DiEuliis D, Lutes C, Lim Y. The digitization of biology: understanding the new risks and implications for governance [technical report]. Washington, DC: National Defense University. Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction; 2018.
Berger KM, Schneck PA. National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of Biological Data. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7 (21):21. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00021
DiEuliis D, Giordano J. Why gene editors like CRISPR/Cas may be a game-changer for neuroweapons. Health Secur. 2017; 15(3):296-302. DOI: 10.1089/hs.2016.0120
Diggans J, Leproust E. Next steps for access to safe, secure DNA synthesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7(86):86. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00086
Erman M, Finkle J. Merck says cyber attack halted production, will hurt profits. Reuters; 2017.
Eshoo A, Schiff A. China’s grip on pharmaceutical drugs is a national security issue. The Washington Post [cited Sep 10] [cited Feb 25 2021]; 2019. Available:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/we-rely-on-china-forpharmaceutical-drugs-thats-a-security-threat/2019/09/10/5f35e1ce-d3ec-11e9-9343-40db57cf6abd_story
Fair P, Farrant G. Australian government announces a foreign interference task force for universities. Glob Compliance News Backer McKenzie. 2019, September 19.
George AM. The national security implications of cyberbiosecurity. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7(51):51. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00051
Greenwood JC. Biotech in China. Eur Biopharm Rev. 2013;62-4.
Guttieres D, Stewart S, Wolfrum J, Springs SL. Cyberbiosecurity in Advanced Manufacturing models. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7(210):210. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00210
Heinemann JA, Walker S. Environmentally applied nucleic acids and proteins for purposes of engineering changes to genes and other genetic material. Biosaf Health. 2019;1(3):113-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.09.003
Kania E, Wilson V. Weaponizing Biotech: How China’s military is preparing for a ’new domain of warfare,’; 2019. Defense One [cited Aug 14, 2019]. Available:https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2019/08/chinasmilitary-pursuing-biotech/159167
Knapp B. Fifth domain, researchers are sounding the alarm on cyberbiosecurity; 2018 [cited Apr 20 2020].
Available:https://www.fifthdomain.com/dod/2018/02/08/researchers-are-sounding-thealarm-on-cyberbiosecurity/
Lawless J, Kirka D. UK, US, Canada accuse Russia of hacking virus vaccine trials; 2020. TechXplore [cited (Jul 16)] [cited Feb 24 2021]. Available:https://techxplore.com/news/2020-07-uk-canada-accuse-russia-hacking.html?utm_ source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=TechXplore.com_TrendMD_1
Marsh S. US joins UK in Blaming Russia for NotPetya Cyber-attack. The Guardian [cited Feb 24 2021]. 2018; 15(02). Available:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/15/uk-blames-russia-notpetya-cyber-attack-ukraine
Millett K, dos Santos E, Millett PD. Cyber-biosecurity risk perceptions in the Biotech sector. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7 (136):136. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00136
Moritz RL, Berger KM, Owen BR, Gillum DR. Promoting biosecurity by professionalizing biosecurity. Science. 2020;367(6480):856-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba0376
Mueller S. Facing the 2020 pandemic: What does cyberbiosecurity want us to know to safeguard the future? Biosaf Health. 2021;3(1):11-21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.09.007
Murch R, DiEuliis D. Editorial: Mapping the cyberbiosecurity enterprise. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 [editorial];7(235):235. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00235
Murch RS, So WK, Buchholz WG, Raman S, Peccoud J. Cyberbiosecurity: An emerging new discipline to help safeguard the bioeconomy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6(39):39. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00039
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Safeguarding the bioeconomy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020. DOI: 10.17226/25525.
House W. National strategy for COVID-19 response and pandemic preparedness (January). Washington, DC; 2021.
House W. National security memorandum on U. S global leadership to strengthen the international COVID-19 response and advance global security (January). Washington, DC; 2021.
Wintle BC, Boehm CR, Rhodes C, Molloy JC, Millett P, Adam L et al. A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering. eLife. 2017;6: e30247. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.30247
Javorcik B. Global supply chains will not be the same in the post-COVID-19 world. In: Baldwin R, Evenett S, editors. COVID-19 and trade policy: why turning inward won’t work. London: CEPR Press; 2020.