GC-MS Analysis of Biogas from Pineapple Peels and Toxicological Evaluation of Generated Effluent

Faith Ajiebabhio Ogbole *

Biochemistry Unit, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Africa, Toru – Orua, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Charity Oyindenepre Akemi

Biochemistry Unit, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Africa, Toru – Orua, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aim: To determine the composition of gases in the biogas produced from pineapple peels and to evaluate the effect of effluent from pineapple peel biodigester (EPB) on the liver functions of Catfish (Clarias gariepinus).

Methodology: Pineapple peels were grounded, fed into an anaerobic biodigester and emitted biogas was collected for GC-MS analysis. Twenty Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) were grouped into four: Group I: Control (placed in fresh water for 2 days); Group II: (placed in undiluted EPB for six hours), Group III: (placed in undiluted EPB for 2 days), Group IV:  (placed in 1:10 dilution of EPB for 2 days). The serum activities of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) in catfish were determined using standard methods.

Results: The identified gases (percentage per volume) were: hydrogen (0.42%), methane (94.02%), carbon monoxide (0.36%), carbon dioxide (2.03%), hydrogen sulphide (0.89%), water (0.13%), nitrogen (1.52) and oxygen (0.63). Aside from methane, the rest gases were impurities. Emission of biogas was observed under 24 hours. All the fish in group III died before the twelfth hour. Compared with control, similar results for serum activities of AST, ALT and ALP were found in group IV. On the contrary, a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the activities of serum AST, ALT, and ALP was found in group II. In conclusion, biogas with a high percentage per volume of methane gas (94.02%) with negligible impurities was produced from pineapple peels in the present study. The present study also found that undiluted effluent from pineapple peels anaerobic biodigester was toxic to the liver of catfish, while a 1:10 dilution of the effluent was nontoxic to the liver of catfish. Therefore, the disposal of pineapple peels by converting it to biogas is highly recommended, however effluents generated should be diluted before disposal into the environment.

Keywords: Biogas, GC-MS, methane, pineapple peels, effluents, AST, ALT, ALP


How to Cite

Ogbole , Faith Ajiebabhio, and Charity Oyindenepre Akemi. 2023. “GC-MS Analysis of Biogas from Pineapple Peels and Toxicological Evaluation of Generated Effluent”. Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering 6 (2):96-104. https://www.journalajbge.com/index.php/AJBGE/article/view/104.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Li D, Jing M, Dai X, Chen Z, Ma C, Chen J. Current status of pineapple breeding, industrial development, and genetics in China.Euphytica.2022;218:85. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-022-03030-y

Okoronkwo FI, Disegha GC. Bacteriological quality evaluation of ready-to-eat pineapple fruit slices sold in markets around port harcourt and it’s environ in Rivers State, Nigeria. JASEM. 2022;24(8).

Aili HAF, Hamzah MH, Che MH, Jamali NS, Siajam SI, Ismail MH. Recent updates on the conversion of pineapple waste (Ananas comosus) to value-added products, future perspectives and challenges. Agronomy. 2021;11.

Unnikrishnan G. Vijayarghavan R. Anaerobic digestion of pineapple waste for biogas production and application of slurry as liquid fertilizer carrier for phosphate solubilizers. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2021; 5777:1-8.

Getabalew M, Alemneh T, Bzuneh E. Review on methanogenesis and its role. World J. Agri & Soil Sci. 2020;6(2).

González R, Peña DC, Gómez X. Anaerobic co-digestion of wastes: Reviewing current status and approaches for enhancing biogas production.Appl. Sci.2022;12:8884.

Bello SK, Alamu OS. Design and construction of a domestic biogas digester. JET. 2016;6(2):8-15.

Otieno EO, Kiplimo R, Mutwiwa U. Optimization of anaerobic digestion parameters for biogas production from pineapple wastes co-digested with livestock wastes. Heliyon. 2023;9(3).

Chulalaksananukul S, Sinbuathong N, Chulalaksananukul W. Bioconversion of pineapple solid waste under anaerobic condition through biogas production. KKU Res. J. 2012;17(5):734-742.

Rani DS, Nand K. Ensilage of pineapple processing waste for methane generation. Waste Manag. 2004;24(5):523-8.

Nsubuga MD, Kabenge I, Kiggundu N, Wydra KD. Comparative study of biogas production from jackfruit waste, banana peels, and pineapple peels co-digested with cow dung. J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst. 2023;13(1).

Wichitsathian B,Yimrattanabavorn J, Wonglertarak W. Enhancement of biogas production from pineapple waste by acid-alkaline pretreatment. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2020;471.

Yang LL, LiY. Biogas cleaning and upgrading technologies. Accessed: March 26;2014. Available:https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/AEX-653.1-14.

Hultberg M, Lind O, Birgersson G, Asp H. Use of the effluent from biogas production for cultivation of Spirulina, Bioprocess Biosyst Eng.2017;40(4):625–631.

Popović NT, Čižmek L, Babić S, Strunjak-Perović I, Čož-Rakovac R. Fish liver damage related to the wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(17):48739-48768.

Ogbole FA, Crown OO, Olayeriju OS, Olaleye MT, Akindahunsi AA. Hepatoprotective and antidyslipidemic effect of methanolic extract of Garcinia kola leaves on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. IJEAST. 2019;4(4):1-5.

Ogbole FA, Crown OO, Olayeriju OS, Olaleye MT, Akindahunsi AA. Antidiabetic effect of methanolic extract of Garcinia kola leaves on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. GSJ 2019;7(4):634- 641.

Grabicova K, Grabic R, Fedorova G, Fick J, Cerveny D, Kolarova J, Turek J, Ziabek V, Randak T. Bioaccumulation of psychoactive pharmaceuticals in fish in an effluent dominated stream. Water Res. 2017;124(7).

Ogbole FA. Oyelana O. Health risk assessment of the drinking water from Sagbama River, Bayelsa State, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Int.j.sci.eng.res. 2020;11(9).

Ogbole FA. Urinalysis for dehydration, kidney injury and urinary tract infection assessment in rural riverside, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. IJISRT. 2021;6(12):806-810.

Piechota G. Siloxanes in biogas: Approaches of sampling procedure and gc-ms method determination. Molecules. 2021;26(7):1953.

Achilike NM, Anyanwu PE. Enzymes activities in juveniles and adults of Clarias gariepinus reared in earthen ponds and concrete tanks. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies. IJFAS. 2019;7(2):258-262.

Li Y, Alaimo CP, Kim M, Kado NY, Peppers J, Xue J, Wan C, Green PG, Zhang R, Jenkins BM, Vogel CFA, Wuertz S, Young TM, Kleeman MJ. Composition and toxicity of biogas produced from different feedstocks in California. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(19):11569-11579.

Rashed MMA, Shuichi T. Enhancement of methane concentration by removing contaminants from biogas mixtures using combined method of absorption and adsorption. Int. J. Chem. Eng; 2017.

Rusína J, Chamrádováa K, Jastrzembskib T, Skřínskýc J. Explosion characteristics of a biogas/air mixtures. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2022;90:271-276.

Sreekanth KM, Sahu D. Effect of iron oxide nanoparticle in bio digestion of a portable food-waste digester. J.Chem.Pharm.Res. 2015;7(9):353-359.

Wichitsathian B, Yimrattanabavorn J, Wonglertarak W. Enhancement of biogas production from pineapple waste by acid-alkaline pretreatment. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2020;471.

Wellington A, Baraza LD, Mageto M, Orori KF. Energy evaluation and qualitative analysis of biogas produced from co-digesting kitchen waste and cow dung. IJPS. 2017;16(4):1-13.

Kavuma C. Variation of methane and carbon dioxide yield in a biogas plant. Accessed; 2013.

Available:https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:604559/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Bhajani SS, Pai SL. Review: Factors affecting biogas production. IJRASET; 2022.

Manan MA, Webb C. Design aspects of solid state fermentation as applied to microbial bioprocessing.J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;4(1):511-532.

Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:4044-4064.

Calli B, Yenigun O, Mertoglu B, Inanc B. Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochemistry. 2005;40:1285-1292.

Kougias PG, Angelidaki I. Biogas and its opportunities- A review. Frontiers of Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018;12(3).

Kougias PG, Fotidis IA, Zaganas ID, Kotsopoulos TA, Martzopoulos GG. Zeolite and swine inoculum effect on poultry manure biomethanation. Internat Agrophys. 2017;27(2):169-173.

Fotidis IA, Kougias PG, Zaganus ID, Kotsopoulos TA, Martzpoulos GG. Inoculum and zeolite synergistic effect on anaerobic digestion of poultry manure. Environ Technol. 2014;35(9-12):1219-1225.

An D, Wang T, Zhou Q, Wang C, Yang Q, Xu B, Zhang Q. Effects of total solids content on performance of sludge mesophilic anaerobic digestion and dewaterability of digested sludge. Waste Management. 2017;62(1):188-193.

Nte ME, Hart A, Edun OM, Akinrotimi OA. Alterations in enzymes activities as a biomarker in black Ijaw Tiliapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron) exposed to industrial effluents. CJBiolSci 2011;4(2): 37-44.

Newsome PN, Cramb R, Davison SM, Dillon JF, Foulerton M, Godfrey EM, Hall R, Harrower U, Hudson M, Langford A, Mackie A, Mitchell-Thain R, Sennett K, Sheron NC, Verne J, Walmsley M, Yeoman A. Guidelines on the management of abnormal liver bloodtests. Gut. 2018;67: 6-19.